The present publication can be defined in three words: relevant, original and novel. It is a work divided into four parts, which is immersed in the study of procedural and procedural law for the cross-border litigation in civil and criminal disputes, from a very interesting perspective, mainly for two reasons: originality and critical-constructive character. The book begins with a work on teaching innovation in procedural law in todays globalised, multicultural and interconnected society. The other three parts of the book deal with very new topics in the resolution of cross-border disputes, from the protection of the rights of vulnerable groups, procedural issues such as digital evidence, data encryption, class actions, alternative dispute resolution methods, among many other subjects that shape the resolution of disputes today.

La Constitución de la República de Cuba de 1992 es básicamente la misma de 1976. Solo agrega algunas modificaciones y adiciones, como el capítulo de la extranjería, del estado de emergencia y de la d

Since the beginning of his presidential term president Donald Trump is faced with constant criticism for his business projects in Russia and his connections with the Russian authorities. After the outbreak of the TrumpUkraine scandal those allegations served as a foundation for initiating the impeachment procedure against the president. This book provides the complete overview of the impeach procedure against the president Donald Trump, including declassified documents, transcripts and reports of various US security agencies and governmental bodies involved in the investigation.Impeachment: An Overview of Constitutional Provisions, Procedure, and Practice Efforts to Impeach Donald TrumpDocuments & Transcripts Related to Impeachment AttemptDismissal of James Comey James Comey FBI Farewell Letter Representative Al Green Calls for Trump Impeachment Jason Chaffetz Letter to FBI Over Comey MemoLegal Grounds for Appointing a Special Counsel The Jurisdiction and the Power of a Special Counsel Appointment of Special Counsel to Investigate Russian Interference With the 2016 Presidential Election and Related Matters Comey Statement for the Record Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Executive Order - Taking Additional Steps to Address the National Emergency With Respect to Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities Russian Cyber Activity The Grizzly Steppe Report Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US ElectionsJoint Statement on Committee Inquiry into Russian Intelligence ActivitiesNational Security Agency ReportLetter From William Barr to Leaders of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees Notifying Them About Conclusion of the InvestigationThe Mueller Report

In Lysander Spooners An Essay on the Trial by Jury, the author explores the importance of trial by jury in ensuring justice and safeguarding individual rights. Spooners writing is characterized by his clear and logical arguments, making this book an essential read for anyone interested in law and civil liberties. Written in the mid-19th century, this book remains relevant today, providing insight into the historical development of the jury system and its role in protecting citizens from government tyranny. Lysander Spooner, a prominent American abolitionist and legal theorist, was known for his radical views on individual rights and limited government. His experiences with the legal system likely influenced his writing on the trial by jury, as he saw firsthand the power of ordinary citizens to hold the government accountable. Spooners expertise in legal theory and his passion for justice shine through in this thought-provoking work. I highly recommend An Essay on the Trial by Jury to anyone interested in legal history, civil liberties, or political philosophy. Spooners insightful analysis and persuasive arguments make this book a timeless classic that continues to inspire readers to think critically about the role of the jury in upholding democratic principles and preventing government overreach.

Frederic DeWitt WellsThe Man in Court is a gripping novel that delves into the complexities of the legal system and the human condition. Written in a compelling prose style, Wells artfully intertwines themes of justice, morality, and redemption throughout the narrative. The book takes place in a small town where a man finds himself entangled in a legal battle that forces him to confront his past and his own beliefs. Wells attention to detail and character development make The Man in Court a thought-provoking read that examines the intricacies of the legal process and the impact it has on individuals. As a legal scholar, Wells draws on his knowledge of the law to bring authenticity to the story, adding depth and insight to the narrative. Readers who enjoy legal dramas or stories that explore ethical dilemmas will find The Man in Court both captivating and enlightening, making it a must-read for those interested in the intersection of law and literature.

Since the beginning of his presidential term president Donald Trump is faced with constant criticism for his business projects in Russia and his connections with the Russian authorities. On June 12th 2017 US Congressman Brad Sherman submitted the Resolution for Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors. This book presents the latest investigation results, declassified documents, transcripts and reports of various US security agencies and other actors involved in the investigation of the Russian Interference in the 2016 United States Elections and the connection of the American president with the Russian Government. This book will provide all necessary information on the event that can easily turn out to be the biggest political scandal in the modern American history.Contents:Impeachment: An Overview of Constitutional Provisions, Procedure, and PracticeEfforts to Impeach Donald TrumpRussian Interference in the 2016 United States ElectionsDocuments Related to Russian InterferenceExecutive Order - Taking Additional Steps to Address the National Emergency With Respect to Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled ActivitiesRussian Cyber Activity The Grizzly Steppe ReportAssessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US ElectionsJoint Statement on Committee Inquiry into Russian Intelligence ActivitiesNational Security Agency Report Documents & Transcripts Related to Impeachment Attempt Dismissal of James ComeyJames Comey FBI Farewell LetterRepresentative Al Green Calls for Trump ImpeachmentJason Chaffetz Letter to FBI Over Comey MemoAppointment of Special Counsel to Investigate Russian Interference With the 2016 Presidential Election and Related Matters Comey Statement for the Record Senate Select Committee on IntelligenceImpeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for High Crimes and Misdemeanors

A Constituição Federal de 1988 trouxe ao Poder Judiciário uma nova ideia de justiça, a qual está sendo moldada e reestruturada com a elaboração de novas leis. O objetivo do presente trabalho é fazer

On December 18, 2019, the House of Representatives impeached Donald Trump along party lines. President Trump was charge for abusing the power of the presidency by withholding military aid as a means of pressuring the newly elected president of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky to perform two favors: to pursue investigations of Joe Biden and his son Hunter, and to investigate a conspiracy theory that Ukraine, not Russia, was behind interference in the 2016 presidential election. The House of Representatives conducted an investigation and entire procedure which involved hearings and pleading of evidences. This book provides all key reports, transcripts and evidences presented against the president as well as in his favor. A number of documents presented make this book a necessary read for anyone interested in Americas biggest political scandal of 21st century.Documents & Transcripts Related to Impeachment AttemptDismissal of James Comey James Comey FBI Farewell Letter Representative Al Green Calls for Trump Impeachment Jason Chaffetz Letter to FBI Over Comey MemoLegal Grounds for Appointing a Special Counsel The Jurisdiction and the Power of a Special Counsel Appointment of Special Counsel to Investigate Russian Interference With the 2016 Presidential Election and Related Matters Comey Statement for the Record Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Executive Order - Taking Additional Steps to Address the National Emergency With Respect to Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities Russian Cyber Activity The Grizzly Steppe Report Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US ElectionsJoint Statement on Committee Inquiry into Russian Intelligence ActivitiesNational Security Agency ReportLetter From William Barr to Leaders of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees Notifying Them About Conclusion of the InvestigationThe Mueller Report

La presente investigación versa sobre el estudio de la figura de la mediación, desarrollada desde la perspectiva de implementarse como solución alternativa de conflictos que otorgue las garantías constitucionales de la tutela efectiva de la justicia (tutela judicial efectiva, art. 24.1º CE). Para ello, verificamos si las actuales leyes de mediacion españolas cumplen dentro de su articulado con los contenidos basicos establecidos por el Tribunal Constitucional sobre tutela judicial efectiva TJE (ver los pronunciamientos del TC en la introduccion al capitulo II), toda vez que defendemos que cualquier ley que reglamente una alternativa de resolucion de conflictos no solamente debe respetar que las personas involucradas en el conflicto puedan acudir en cualquier momento al proceso judicial sino que dentro del articulado de la norma que la regule deben integrarse todos y cada uno de los contenidos basicos de la tutela efectiva de la justicia (actualmente, TJE) logrando asi que se integren todas las vias legales de solucion a los conflictos dentro de una sola Administracion de la Justicia.

El trabajo presentado como Tesis Doctoral se propone, como punto de partida, el examen de los fundamentos del Estado social y democrático de Derecho y la adopción de sus principios constitucionales e historicos, como fuente del Derecho. Son principios que legitiman el Poder Judicial, como uno de los organos soberanos del Estado, en garantizar los derechos sociales constitucionalmente exigibles, inclusive en las carceles. La investigacion cubre tres aspectos: 1. El desarrollo historico del Estado social con soporte en los derechos de igualdad y de libertad; 2. Las corrientes doctrinales de garantia de los derechos sociales en la formacion del derecho subjetivo a tutela estatal; y 3. La ejecucion penal en Brasil y la propuesta para la efectuacion de una resocializacion espontanea, basada en la garantia de los derechos sociales fundamentales.

O livro tem como objetivo investigar o enquadramento dado aos animais não humanos pelo ordenamento jurídico brasileiro para, então, entender a posição que ocupam nas entidades familiares contemporâne

Operação Hashtag trata do importante e delicado tema relacionado ao terrorismo contemporâneo, classificado por especialistas como "novo terrorismo", que através da redemundial de computadores, especi

Mediação no judiciário: teoria na prática e prática na teoria traz ao público uma visão geral dos casos atendidos pelas autoras, na realização dos seus trabalhos no Fórum de Santana, em São Paulo. Al

Entre salas e celas é um retrato do cotidiano de audiências criminais sob a visão do juiz. O drama da decisão, a prisão injusta que se revela no meio do processo, a violência, o medo e a desesperança

En el ámbito del lenguaje jurídico, especialmente el de naturaleza escrita, la observancia de ciertas pautas de previsibilidad, de convenciones que permitan a los receptores de la información disponer y asimilar plenamente aquella se impone con especial rigor, no en vano, en este tipo de lenguaje, por sus peculiaridades y caracteristicas tecnicas, se emplea con profusion el mecanismo de la cita legal y jurisprudencial, invocaciones destinadas a ilustrar o fundamentar determinada decision o juicio juridico y cuya eficacia en los destinatarios de dicha informacion depende en gran medida de que estos puedan identificar las referencias empleadas, evitando precisamente que se conviertan en un obstaculo para la comprension del texto. Un aspecto especialmente sensible en torno a los protocolos de citacion legal en nuestra literatura juridica asi como en las propias resoluciones dictadas por los organos jurisdiccionales es el relativo a la forma de citar las referencias jurisprudenciales y mas concretamente, la jurisprudencia emanada del Tribunal Supremo. Por ello, en esta obra se pretende verificar si esa imprescindible regla de homogeneidad a la hora de practicar la cita jurisprudencial en nuestro ordenamiento juridico se cumple, atendiendo para ello al panorama existente en el Derecho Comparado, su incidencia y las perspectivas de futuro acerca de una cuestion que, por su trascendencia, despierta cada vez un mayor interes entre los diferentes agentes juridicos de nuestro pais.

De los instrumentos de derecho internacional de derechos humanos y de derecho penal internacional, de las constituciones políticas y de sus interpretaciones autorizadas, se infiere un conjunto de principios normativos del proceso penal que determinan una estructura basica y que sientan las bases para la elaboracion de un modelo dogmatico, Uno de los elementos para tener en cuenta en esta tarea es el atinente a los limites del poder de acusar y a la instancia concebida para la verificacion del respeto de esos limites.Con todo, a diferencia de lo que ocurre en la mayoria de regimenes del derecho comparado, de la estructura del proceso penal colombiano no hace parte una fase intermedia ante el juez de las audiencias preliminares que comprenda el control material de la acusacion, Ademas, la interpretacion jurisprudencial plantea que solo hay lugar a un control ante el juez de conocimiento que, para no afectar su imparcialidad, se limita a la verificacion de los presupuestos formales del escrito de acusacion.Sin embargo, la practica judicial evidencia situaciones en las que ese escrito presenta manifiestas irregularidades que no son susceptibles de ser superadas por via de un control formal. En estos casos es posible un control excepcional de la acusacion que, sin recaer sobre su fundamento sustancial, impida, en situaciones extremas, el abuso del poder de acusar, y como el control formal y el control excepcional de extremos sobre la acusacion no solucionan el problema central planteado por la inexistencia de un control material, el camino mas expedito para hacerlo es una reforma al Codigo de Procedimiento Penal. Hasta tanto, los instrumentos a los que se podria acudir con ese proposito son el autocontrol de la Fiscalia y la accion de tutela.

Los estudios que componen este trabajo forman parte del capítulo de reflexiones sobre la prueba que he venido realizando a lo largo de los últimos quince años. Los temas que abarcan son muy variados, aunque todos ellos estan unidos por una linea argumental comun: no es asumible una concepcion puramente irracional o subjetiva del juicio de hecho, ni es tampoco aceptable una vision ingenua, acritica o mecanicista del mismo. Lo primero, porque el juicio de hecho (o la valoracion de la prueba, que es su nucleo esencial) no puede contemplarse como un modo liberrimo de construccion de una verdad procesal ajena al control de los hechos. Lo segundo, porque dicho juicio esta sometido a serias limitaciones epistemicas e institucionales que hacen que sus resultados no puedan ser aceptados como incontrovertibles sino solo como probables, por mas alta que esta probabilidad pueda ser. Simplemente, el juicio de hecho es tan problematico o mas que el juicio de derecho; es un ambito de esencial incertidumbre y no de certezas incuestionables; es, en definitiva, el espacio de ejercicio del poder judicial menos reglado y donde en consecuencia el juez puede ser mas arbitrario. Es precisamente la conciencia de ese inmenso poder que el juez administra lo que auspicia algun tipo de control sobre la libre valoracion. Si asi no fuese, la valoracion mas que libre seria liberrima, subjetiva e incontrolable ( intima o en conciencia , en la sorprendente terminologia al uso), con lo cual se abandonaria la racionalidad para entrar en el campo del puro decisionismo judicial. Un minimo compromiso con el constitucionalismo exige dotar de racionalidad ese espacio de la decision judicial tantas veces opaco a cualquier control.

Este livro revisita o conceito do princípio da duração razoável do processo, tendo como marco teórico a noção de tempo kairológico de Giacomo Marramao. Observa que esse princípio, garantido não só na

El trasnfondo de las ideas que se desarrollan en este texto se relaciona con que en las democracias occidentales el Parlamento es el ámbito en el que se toman las grandes decisiones del Estado. A él le compete, entre otras cosas, la regulacion, reglamentacion o limitacion de los derechos constitucionales. Esta ultima tarea,como es sabido, se encuentra a su vez sujeta a la judicial review, al control de constitucionalidad que lleva adelante el poder juducial.

O autor propõe nesta obra uma releitura da ordem de vocação hereditária para incluir os embriões da fertilização in vitro. Tendo como norte a teoria concepcionista e, subsidiariamente, com a concepçã